What about 1.0.2 release?

Hi all,
I propose to release 1.0.2 when crashes #3091179 and #3091185 are fixed.
People like software that doesn’t crash :slight_smile:

Any opinions?

–
Regards,
Konstantin

I agree, a new release is a bit overdue (Has it been a year?).

Those crashes are quite strange. I can reproduce the smiles one here,
but it’s one of those nasty little crashes that leaves nothing useful
in the backtrace…

Dave

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 3:17 AM, Konstantin Tokarev annulen@yandex.ru wrote:

Hi all,
I propose to release 1.0.2 when crashes #3091179 and #3091185 are fixed.
People like software that doesn’t crash :slight_smile:

Any opinions?

–
Regards,
Konstantin


Nokia and AT&T present the 2010 Calling All Innovators-North America contest
Create new apps & games for the Nokia N8 for consumers in U.S. and Canada
$10 million total in prizes - $4M cash, 500 devices, nearly $6M in marketing
Develop with Nokia Qt SDK, Web Runtime, or Java and Publish to Ovi Store
http://p.sf.net/sfu/nokia-dev2dev


Avogadro-devel mailing list
Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
avogadro-devel List Signup and Options

21.10.2010, 14:29, “David Lonie” loniedavid@gmail.com:

I agree, a new release is a bit overdue (Has it been a year?).

Those crashes are quite strange. I can reproduce the smiles one here,
but it’s one of those nasty little crashes that leaves nothing useful
in the backtrace…

Qt says that exception is thrown in event handler and it is not supported.
This explains crash and empty stack

–
Regards,
Konstantin

I agree, a new release is a bit overdue (Has it been a year?).

1.0.1 was released on 28 of April, not so long ago :slight_smile:
Note that I’m talking about “crashfixer”, which requires much less effort than is needed for 1.1.0

–
Regards,
Konstantin

On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 6:39 AM, Konstantin Tokarev annulen@yandex.ru wrote:

I agree, a new release is a bit overdue (Has it been a year?).

1.0.1 was released on 28 of April, not so long ago :slight_smile:
Note that I’m talking about “crashfixer”, which requires much less effort than is needed for 1.1.0

Ah yes, I was thinking of 1.0.

Dave

I can reproduce the smiles one here,
but it’s one of those nasty little crashes that leaves nothing useful
in the backtrace…

It goes up to drawcommand.cpp:119, than crashes on
Q_CHECK_PTR( atom );
where atom is null pointer. This null pointer is obtained using id (1) of previously auto-added hydrogen

–
Regards,
Konstantin

21.10.2010, 21:43, “Konstantin Tokarev” annulen@yandex.ru:

I can reproduce the smiles one here,
but it’s one of those nasty little crashes that leaves nothing useful
in the backtrace…

It goes up to drawcommand.cpp:119, than crashes on
Q_CHECK_PTR( atom );
where atom is null pointer. This null pointer is obtained using id (1) of previously auto-added hydrogen

When I’ve commented Q_CHECK_PTR, everything is working as expected.
But it not seems to be correct (atom pointer is got using invalid id).
I guess that d->atomIds should not contain id’s of adjusted H’s. Am I right?

–
Regards,
Konstantin