Hello Avogadro I had used the Avogadro (with gold lace) application to generate a 3D File from a PubChem 2D file, the ligand was large 89-heavy atoms/1000 Daltons, was Avogadro able to accurately 3D build this large of a ligand? Thanks if you know:)
There’s no “maximum size” and certainly I’ve converted molecules larger than 80-90 atoms. Do you have a particular file? Most are available already in 3D format.
Not sure what you mean by the “gold lace” though.
Hello ghutchis thank you for your kind update:) and yes my molecule I could not discover on PubChem nor PDB, regardlessly attached is the PubChem 2D Structural File that I had built into a 3D File via Avogadro (see screenshot for color as opposed to blue color). I am unsure how accurate the Avogadro final 3D conformation is, if you have any further feedback feel free to reply (I am to dock this ligand into a transmembrane protein, accordingly in search of a starting accurate conformation.). Thanks:)
10Panx1_PubChem_2D.sdf (20.3 KB)
You should use the latest version of Avogadro2: Install — Avogadro 1.102.1 documentation - yes it’s blue with a little number 2 in the icon. I can see that the current builds of Avo2 don’t recognize that the file is 2D only and needs 3D coordinate generation.
The easy workaround is to Edit ⇒ Copy As ⇒ SMILES and then in a new file, Build ⇒ Insert ⇒SMILES
I’m not sure I understand what you mean by “how accurate” a 3D conformation is.
A molecule like this is large and flexible. There are likely to be multiple thermally accessible conformers, so you should generate several. There is no one measure of “accurate” for a case like this.
For example, we discussed this with my colleague David Koes in a recent paper:
“Conformer Generation for Structure-Based Drug Design: How Many and How Good?”
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.3c01245
You can use Avogadro2 to generate starting conformers. For example - you can use the Genetic Algorithm / RSMD scoring method:
Or you can use RDKit or other tools as discussed in the paper.
And here’s your file, by the way:
example.sdf (15.2 KB)
Hello ghutchis thank you for your kind update:), understood, agreed and this has been my methodology i.e. to take more than one conformation towards docking. Also thank you for the paper (I will read it) and the file!
For what it’s worth, Avogadro2 now has this patch building, which will use the 3D coordinate generation from Open Babel when reading 2D SDF files:
Hi ghutchis thank you for your kind update:) and I had Avogadro (Gold) 1.2.0 Generated a nice 3D Coordinate File for the ligand indicated in this thread via a PubChem 2D.sdf File (nice meaning regardless of the multiple conformations, this conformation matched similar ligand experimental visual bindings) that I selected towards docking, accordingly would the Avogadro2 generate something substantially more accurate? (I inquire since I had already docked this and selected the best model.) Thanks if you know:)
No, both versions of Avogadro use Open Babel for coordinate generation and conformer searching.
Hi ok thanks a bunch for the affirmation:)
