Fate of table-based Cartesian editor

Development
1

Since we haven’t come to consensus about old Cartesian editor, I’d like to remember possible solutions:

  1. Switching before old and new versions
    This will make two extensions depending on each other, which can be a trouble

  2. Complete removal - some code was commented out, but there is large amount of code in propmodel.cpp
    In this case, sorting needs to be introduced in new editor (if someone desires it). Probably, its design should be improved to be more eye-candy

  3. Moving X,Y,Z columns into Atom properties dialog

What solution do you like?

–
Regards,
Konstantin

2
  1. Moving X,Y,Z columns into Atom properties dialog

I think I like this approach the best.

That’s my $0.02,
-Geoff

3

Arg, forgot to reply-all in gmail…

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: David Lonie loniedavid@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:04 AM
Subject: Re: [Avogadro-devel] Fate of table-based Cartesian editor
To: Geoffrey Hutchison geoff.hutchison@gmail.com

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 10:35 AM, Geoffrey Hutchison
geoff.hutchison@gmail.com wrote:

  1. Moving X,Y,Z columns into Atom properties dialog

I think I like this approach the best.

Seconded – I always thought they were needed there.

Dave