# Maybe include the molecular dynamics algorithm in Avogadro2

**URL:** <https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/maybe-include-the-molecular-dynamics-algorithm-in-avogadro2/6744>\
**Category:** General Discussion\
**Created:** [February 4, 2025, 9:53am UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/maybe-include-the-molecular-dynamics-algorithm-in-avogadro2/6744 "2025-02-04T09:53:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![matterhorn103](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/user_avatar/discuss.avogadro.cc/matterhorn103/32/1751_2.png) [@matterhorn103](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/u/matterhorn103)\
**Post date:** [February 4, 2025, 2:17pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/maybe-include-the-molecular-dynamics-algorithm-in-avogadro2/6744/2 "2025-02-04T14:17:15Z")

</div>

It is on [the roadmap](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/avogadro-2025-roadmap/6692). 🙂

I believe Geoff’s primary goal/condition for 2.0 is that it should essentially have feature parity with 1.2, so if you take a look at the roadmap and find that something key to your usage of 1.2 is not there (and is not implemented already), I would recommend bringing it up!

---

_[View the full topic](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/maybe-include-the-molecular-dynamics-algorithm-in-avogadro2/6744)._