# KDE 4.2 plans

**URL:** <https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082>\
**Category:** Development\
**Created:** [September 8, 2008, 12:31pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082 "2008-09-08T12:31:01Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 6\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Benoit\_Jacob](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Benoit\_Jacob](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/u/Benoit_Jacob)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2008, 12:31pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082/1 "2008-09-08T12:31:01Z")

</div>

Hi,

The KDE 4.2 soft feature freeze has been pushed back to Sep 29th,  
[http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2\_Release\_Schedule](http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Release_Schedule)

Which means that before that date we must have edited the feature plan,  
[http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2\_Feature\_Plan](http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Feature_Plan)

The hard feature freeze will be Oct 27th.

Is it still the plan reach API+ABI stability in libavogadro by the end of this  
year, and to make KDE 4.2 depend on it, removing its local copy? Anybody up  
for this todo item? Of course Marcus already did the bulk of the work in KDE  
4.1.

Cheers,  
Benoit

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Benoit\_Jacob](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Benoit\_Jacob](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/u/Benoit_Jacob)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2008, 7:35pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082/2 "2008-09-08T19:35:18Z")

</div>

Hi,

the release-team just reverted to the original schedule, which gives us a bit  
more time:

[http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2\_Release\_Schedule](http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Release_Schedule)

Cheers,  
Benoit

On Monday 08 September 2008 14:31:01 Benoît Jacob wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> The KDE 4.2 soft feature freeze has been pushed back to Sep 29th,  
> [Schedules/KDE4/4.2 Release Schedule - KDE TechBase](http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Release_Schedule)
> 
> Which means that before that date we must have edited the feature plan,  
> [Schedules/KDE4/4.2 Feature Plan - KDE TechBase](http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Feature_Plan)
> 
> The hard feature freeze will be Oct 27th.
> 
> Is it still the plan reach API+ABI stability in libavogadro by the end of  
> this year, and to make KDE 4.2 depend on it, removing its local copy?  
> Anybody up for this todo item? Of course Marcus already did the bulk of the  
> work in KDE 4.1.
> 
> Cheers,  
> Benoit
> 
> * * *
> 
> This [SF.Net](http://SF.Net) email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer’s  
> challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win  
> great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere  
> in the world [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner\_id=100&url=/](http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/)
> 
> * * *
> 
> Avogadro-devel mailing list  
> [Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net](mailto:Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)  
> [avogadro-devel List Signup and Options](https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avogadro-devel)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhanwell](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/user_avatar/discuss.avogadro.cc/mhanwell/32/16_2.png) [@mhanwell](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/u/mhanwell)\
**Post date:** [September 8, 2008, 8:25pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082/3 "2008-09-08T20:25:44Z")

</div>

On Monday 08 September 2008 15:35:18 Benoît Jacob wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> the release-team just reverted to the original schedule, which gives us a  
> bit more time:
> 
> [Schedules/KDE4/4.2 Release Schedule - KDE TechBase](http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/KDE4/4.2_Release_Schedule)
> 
> Cheers,  
> Benoit

I will do what I can to update Kalzium. Certainly update the snapshot and do  
any porting necessary. Some changes are necessary before the API can freeze  
and I am trying to make the time to get them in. I will see what I can do.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Carsten\_Niehaus](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/c/8edcca/32.png) [@Carsten\_Niehaus](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/u/Carsten_Niehaus)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2008, 1:11pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082/4 "2008-09-09T13:11:20Z")

</div>

Am Monday 08 September 2008 22:25:44 schrieb Marcus D. Hanwell:

Moin

> I will do what I can to update Kalzium. Certainly update the snapshot and  
> do any porting necessary. Some changes are necessary before the API can  
> freeze and I am trying to make the time to get them in. I will see what I  
> can do.

Are you going to work on the port to QGV? If not I will move that item to 4.3  
in the plan.

Carsten

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![mhanwell](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/user_avatar/discuss.avogadro.cc/mhanwell/32/16_2.png) [@mhanwell](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/u/mhanwell)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2008, 6:48pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082/5 "2008-09-09T18:48:47Z")

</div>

On Tuesday 09 September 2008 09:11:20 Carsten Niehaus wrote:

> Am Monday 08 September 2008 22:25:44 schrieb Marcus D. Hanwell:
> 
> Moin
> 
> > I will do what I can to update Kalzium. Certainly update the snapshot and  
> > do any porting necessary. Some changes are necessary before the API can  
> > freeze and I am trying to make the time to get them in. I will see what I  
> > can do.
> 
> Are you going to work on the port to QGV? If not I will move that item to  
> 4.3 in the plan.

I would like to get that in if I can find the time, so can we leave it on  
there for now?

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Benoit\_Jacob](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/letter_avatar_proxy/v4/letter/b/e9c0ed/32.png) [@Benoit\_Jacob](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/u/Benoit_Jacob)\
**Post date:** [September 9, 2008, 7:51pm UTC](https://discuss.avogadro.cc/t/kde-4-2-plans/1082/6 "2008-09-09T19:51:01Z")

</div>

We can keep everything in, even not-yet-started, until the hard  
feature freeze.

Cheers,  
Benoit

Quoting “Marcus D. Hanwell” [marcus@cryos.org](mailto:marcus@cryos.org):

> I would like to get that in if I can find the time, so can we leave it on  
> there for now?
> 
> * * *
> 
> This [SF.Net](http://SF.Net) email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer’s challenge  
> Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes  
> Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world  
> [http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner\_id=100&url=/](http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/)
> 
> * * *
> 
> Avogadro-devel mailing list  
> [Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net](mailto:Avogadro-devel@lists.sourceforge.net)  
> [avogadro-devel List Signup and Options](https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/avogadro-devel)

* * *

This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
